Legal Opinion

Cooper v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1897No. 2472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

The appellant entered into a contract with Spurr & Wilmot to improve and pave a certain street in the city of Seattle. While engaged in that work the contractors excavated under a certain water main, removed the earth from around it, and thereafter filled up the excavation. As a result of such excavation and removal of the earth which supported it, the main burst, causing water therefrom to flow into the cellar of respondents, damaging their goods. This action was brought to recover from the city the damages so sustained. There was a verdict…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blake v. . FerrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Pack v. . the Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. City of Cincinnati v. StoneOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Fink v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Epperly v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. North Bend Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Engler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Stricker v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Kaler v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API