Eden v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
On October 5, 1950, the defendant /commission voted to change property of the individual defendants, hereinafter referred to as the Nielsens, from a residence to a business zone. The plaintiffs, nearby property owners, appealed on the ground that the commission abused its discretion. The trial court set aside the action of the commission and the defendants appealed to this court. The case | raises a question of spot zoning.
The finding sets forth the facts in commendable detail, but those essential to a decision can be briefly stated. This summary includes such additional facts as the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Bartram v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Parsons v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.