Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Baltimore Police Department

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 3, 1983No. 666, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C.J.

This appeal is concerned with an interpretation of subsection 728 (b)(10) of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBOR), Md. Ann. Code art. 27, §§ 727-734A.

Subsection 728(b)(10) provides in pertinent part:

"At the request of any law-enforcement officer under interrogation, he shall have the right to be represented by counsel or any other responsible representative of his choice who shall be present at all times during the interrogation, unless waived by the law-enforcement officer.”

—THE FACTS—

Richard P. Nichols, an eight-year veteran of the Baltimore City Police Department…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Uniformed Sanitation Men Association, Inc. v. Commissioner of Sanitation of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. DiGrazia v. COUNTY EXEC. FOR MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Coleman v. Anne Arundel County Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Meyers v. Montgomery County Police DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Chief, Baltimore County Police Department v. MarchsteinerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API