Legal Opinion

Roth v. Hoffer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2006No. 20050328PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Todd A. Roth appeals from an amended judgment in his divorce action against Lynette Hoffer and from an order denying his post-judgment motion. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in granting Hoffer’s motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(a) to correct a clerical mistake in the initial judgment regarding the distribution of the proceeds of Roth’s 401 (k) plan.

I

[¶ 2] In Both v. Hoffer, 2004 ND 72, ¶ 3, 688 N.W.2d 402, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 936, 125 S.Ct. 328, 160 L.Ed.2d 241 (2004), we summarily affirmed Roth’s appeal from a July 2003 divorce judgment. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Kellogg (In Re West Texas Marketing Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee--Cross-Appellant v. Jack Griffin, Appeal of Merrill Moores, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Mary StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. Gruebele v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sosin v. SosinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Kukla v. KuklaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hageness v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Erickson v. OlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Matter of Hogen Trust BNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API