Legal Opinion
Erickson v. Olsen
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 2016No. 20150153PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDEWALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Dean Olsen, Susan Olsen, Bobby Olsen, Olee Raye Olsen, and Marion Bergquist, three stepchildren of Clarence Erickson and two spouses of the stepchildren (collectively “appellants”), appealed from a second amended judgment granting a motion by Clarence Erickson’s biological son, Curtis Erickson, to correct the judgment under N.D.R.Giv.P. 60(a). We conclude the district court abused its discretion in granting relief under Rule 60(a). We reverse the second amended judgment and reinstate the amended judgment.
I
[¶ 2] After Clarence Erickson died in December 2010,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Mary StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gruebele v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Jack W. Kelley v. Bank Building and Equipment Corporation of America, a Corporation, and Advance Glass Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Black Stone Minerals Co., L.P. v. BrokawNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- McDaniel v. BanesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Mid Dakota Clinic P.C. v. LivengoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017