Legal Opinion

Hageness v. Davis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2017No. 20160167PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] The plaintiffs appealed from an amended judgment entered after the district court granted summary judgment dismissing their claims against the defendants (collectively, “Davises” and “Meiers”), seeking to determine title to real property. We conclude the district court did not err in concluding the plaintiffs’ action was time-barred under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-04. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In October 2015, the plaintiffs commenced this quiet title action to determine the parties’ interests in property located in Mountrail County. The plaintiffs generally allege they are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Vandall v. Trinity HospitalsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Markgraf v. WelkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sauter v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Guardianship and Conservatorship of S.M.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. CraigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. People of Michigan v. Anthony Quantez MorrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. People of Michigan v. Leonard SeawoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API