Legal Opinion

Seramone-Isaacs v. Mells

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 28, 2005No. 34, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final judgment that was entered in the Superior Court following a jury trial. The plaintiffs-appel-lees, Victoria Mells and Rashida Berry, filed a civil action for negligence against the defendant-appellant, Paula Seramone-Isaacs, as a result of a motor vehicle accident. The jury awarded Rashida Berry $25,000 and awarded her husband, Larry Piper, $1,000 for loss of consortium. We have concluded that those judgments must be affirmed.

Defendant’s “Theory” Excluded

In this appeal, the defendant contends that the trial judge’s rulings on the- plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Learning Curve Toys, Inc. v. Playwood Toys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Tricoche v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Eskin v. CardenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  4. Davis v. MauteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. John Barilaro v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Appeal of New England Produce Center, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayward v. KingSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Parham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Wendt v. Steelcome LimitedSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  4. Wendt v. Steelcome LimitedSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API