Legal Opinion

Johnjock v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1989No. 6-88-003-CR, 6-88-004-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Michael Johnjock appeals his convictions for delivery of marihuana. The charges were consolidated in a single trial pursuant to Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 3.03 (Vernon 1974). The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

Johnjock first contends that the trial court erred in refusing his requested jury instruction on the defense of entrapment. Entrapment occurs when the defendant committed the offense because he was induced to do so by a law enforcement agent using persuasion or other means likely to cause persons to commit the offense. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 8.06(a)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Norman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Haliburton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Marroquin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Elkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  2. Freeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. Johnjock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Perla Judith Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  5. Tyrell Darnell Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API