Norman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILLIPS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of delivery of heroin. Punishment was assessed at 50 years’ confinement in the Department of Corrections. Appellant initially challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to prove she intentionally and knowingly delivered the heroin.
The record reveals, in a light most favorable to the verdict, that Troy Braswell, a narcotics agent employed by the Texas Department of Public Safety, received a telephone call on January 28, 1976, from Dewayne Hamilton, a-confidential informant, that a meeting for a sale of heroin had been…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Granados v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Deshong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Dugard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.