Legal Opinion
Saucerman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1990No. 11A01-9002-PC60PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFFE, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Michael B. Saucerman (Saucerman) appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
On August 5, 1985, Saucerman agreed to plead guilty to Amended Informations, counts 5, 6, and 7 for Receiving Stolen Property 1 in exchange for the State's agreement to dismiss counts for Attempted Murder, Unlawful Deviate Conduct, and Burglary. The State also agreed not to refile a count for Rape and to dismiss charges from another county. Saucerman left the area before his guilty plea hearing.
After…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Burr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hunt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Beaty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ratliff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992