Gibson v. State

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Jeffery Gibson appeals from his convictions for Attempted Auto Theft,1 a Class D Felony, and Receiving Stolen Property,2 a Class D Felony, and contends that the evidence on both counts is insufficient to sustain a conviction. We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support Gibson’s conviction for Attempted Auto Theft.

2. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support Gibson’s conviction for Receiving Stolen Property.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that on the evening of April 17, 1992, Sheila Cunningham parked her car…