Legal Opinion
Parrish v. McDaniel
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1984No. 7415PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
This case concerns the interpretation of NMSA 1978, Section 40-5-23 (Repl.Pamp. 1983), which states:
Proceedings to enforce the obligation of the father shall not be brought after the lapse of more than two years from the birth of the child unless paternity has been judicially established or has been acknowledged by the father in writing or by the furnishing of support, except that there shall be no time limitation on proceedings initiated by the state.
To avoid the two-year limitation must the furnishing of support or written acknowledgement occur within two years of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Anaconda Co. v. Property Tax DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Kiehne v. AtwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Allen Ex Rel. Allen v. HunnicuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Flores v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moncor Trust Co. v. FeilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987