Hamm v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. “The restriction, ‘for residence purposes/ as contained in the deed involved in this case, does not prohibit the erection of apartment-houses used exclusively for residence purposes.” Courtney v. Hunter, 159 Ga. 321 (125 S. E. 714), and cit.
2. A restrictive covenant in a deed of conveyance, stipulating that “the lot shall not be subdivided, and only one residence shall be erected on each lot,” is not broken by the building of a separate dwelling-house on either lot, although the dwelling-houses on the two separate lots both join a brick party-wall built on the line between said lots. Hamm…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Courtney v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Hamm v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Schwarzschild v. WelborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Stephenson v. PerlitzTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Shepherd v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Baker v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.