Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 13, 1929No. 6979PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. “The restriction, ‘for residence purposes/ as contained in the deed involved in this case, does not prohibit the erection of apartment-houses used exclusively for residence purposes.” Courtney v. Hunter, 159 Ga. 321 (125 S. E. 714), and cit.

2. A restrictive covenant in a deed of conveyance, stipulating that “the lot shall not be subdivided, and only one residence shall be erected on each lot,” is not broken by the building of a separate dwelling-house on either lot, although the dwelling-houses on the two separate lots both join a brick party-wall built on the line between said lots. Hamm…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Courtney v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Hamm v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Schwarzschild v. WelborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  3. Stephenson v. PerlitzTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Shepherd v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Baker v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API