Legal Opinion

State v. Cole

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1992No. 349A89PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with the unrecorded bench conferences at which the court excused some of the jurors. We believe this assignment of error has merit. We held in State v. McCarver, 329 N.C. 259, 404 S.E.2d 821 (1991) and State v. Smith, 326 N.C. 792, 392 S.E.2d 362 (1990), that a defendant’s unwaivable right to be present at every stage of a capital trial made it error for a court to excuse a juror after an unrecorded conference at the bench at which neither the defendant nor his counsel was present.

In this case, it was not error for the court to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. McCarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. HydeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. GeddieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. BucknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API