Joe D. Romero and Virginia Romero v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an action by plaintiffs Joe D. and Virginia Romero for review of a decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, adverse to plaintiffs. The final decision of the Secretary upheld a ruling against plaintiffs that they make repayment of alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ray O. Hedge v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Thomas Guy Morgan, Sr. v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Woods v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Ruth Harrison v. Margaret H. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Fitzgerald (In Re Fitzgerald)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Posnack v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- James P. Kiernan v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.