Legal Opinion

Joe D. Romero and Virginia Romero v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1982No. 79-1737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an action by plaintiffs Joe D. and Virginia Romero for review of a decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, adverse to plaintiffs. The final decision of the Secretary upheld a ruling against plaintiffs that they make repayment of alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ray O. Hedge v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. Thomas Guy Morgan, Sr. v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  3. Woods v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Ruth Harrison v. Margaret H. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Fitzgerald (In Re Fitzgerald)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Posnack v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  5. James P. Kiernan v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API