Legal Opinion
James P. Kiernan v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1983No. 79-2319PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the review provisions of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 355(f), James P. Kiernan timely petitions for review of a final decision of the Railroad Retirement Board (Board) which found that he could not split his military service time from 1951 to 1970 in order to qualify for benefits under both the Railroad Retirement Act (the Act) and the Social Security Act. The Board reported to the Social Security Administration that all of petitioner Kiernan’s military service time was “creditable” under the Railroad Retirement Act. (R. 117).
I
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, City of Allegan, Michigan, Consumers Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- McCulloch Interstate Gas Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Phillips Petroleum Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Thomas Guy Morgan, Sr. v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. State Of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Frank G. Kurka v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pitts v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
- Disbursing Agent of the Hardesty Estate v. Severson (In Re Hardesty)District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003