Legal Opinion

Crabtree v. Burkett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1970No. 7132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

This small case with some large difficulties appears before us for the third time.1 We do not restate more of the facts than *730necessary to bring into focus the legal questions presented. Upon the first trial upon the merits, plaintiff proceeded to judgment upon his theory of rescission, and, as we said on the appeal from that judgment, “elected to abandon the suit for damages.” (433 S.W.2d at p. 10.) Following reversal of the judgment for rescission of the contract, plaintiff amended and sought to recover damages for breach of the contract. Upon the second trial he “elected” to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Slay v. Burnett TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wasson v. StracenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Seaman v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Honeywell, Inc. v. Imperial Condominium Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Hidden Forest Homeowners Association v. James K. Hern, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  5. Wasson v. StracenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API