Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Stumbos

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1990No. C009216PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Appellant (plaintiff) seeks a writ of supersedeas barring respondents (defendants) from attempting to execute on that portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding respondents attorney fees, We are called upon to determine whether enforcement of the award of attorney fees, together with other costs, is automatically stayed by the taking of an appeal. Resolution of that question hinges on whether attorney fees recovered pursuant to a contractual provision are an element of costs when, as here, respondent has not recovered money damages. We conclude that in such a case the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Barragan v. Banco BchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. M. C. & D. Capital Corp. v. GilmakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Vadas v. SosnowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dowling v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Bank of San Pedro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. CHAPALA MANAGEMENT CORP. v. StantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Keefe v. KompaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Nazemi v. TsengCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API