Legal Opinion

Kamel v. Best Buy Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 18, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00033Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WALID KAMEL, Plaintiff, -against- Case No. 1:23-cv-00033 (JLR) MICHAEL PRISCO, MEMORANDUM OPINION Movant, AND ORDER BEST BUY CO., INC., Defendant. JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: Before the Court is a motion by Plaintiff’s former counsel, Michael J. Prisco (“Prisco”), to set a charging lien in the amount of $52,022.74. Dkt. 54. Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Walid Kamel (“Plaintiff” or “Kamel”) opposes the motion. Dkt. 75. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND I. Factual History On April 13,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Stair v. CalhounDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  3. Chadbourne & Parke, LLP v. AB Recur FinansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Cassie Sutton v. New York City Transit Authority, Steven Sardisco, Michael Demeo, Docket No. 04-0429-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. ANTONMARCHI v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API