Legal Opinion

Industrial Power Contractors v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 19, 1992No. 910354-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Presiding Judge:

Industrial Power Contractors (IPC) appeals from an order of the Industrial Commission of Utah (Commission) awarding dependents’ benefits to Wanona Johnson. We affirm.

FACTS

In this original proceeding, we recite the facts as found by the Commission. On September 17, 1988, Hyrum Royden Johnson left Utah to begin employment with IPC as a boilermaker. IPC had contracted to repair, rebuild, and maintain boilers, hoppers, and precipitators at the Simpson Kraft pulp and paper processing mill in Tacoma, Washington. The machinery being repaired was cleaned with an acid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. LairbyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Roy M. Roberts v. Sgt. George Hollocher Det. Al Napier, Acting With Others Det. Gregory SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Joseph v. W. H. Groves Latter Day Saints HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Yacht Club v. Utah Liquor Control CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prosper, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  2. D.J.C. v. P.D.C.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  3. West Valley City v. CoyleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  4. Hoskings v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API