Trustees Internal Improvement Fund v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Florida
The Court having declared itself competent to bear the motion pending in this cause for docketing and rehearing the same according to the act of the Legislature, the next question submitted for consideration was the constitutionality of the act directing this application for a rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
FORWARD, J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.. The Court having at this term decided that the Chief Justice and Associate Justice Walker were qualified in law to hear and determine this motion, or any of the questions *248arising in said cause, the said motion was argued, and, the Court having considered the same, deliver the following opinion :
The history of the action of this Court in said causéis stated in the decision of the Court on the question of the disqualification of said Judges, aiid the question now presented is, whether the Court will docket said cause and grant-the rehearing asked…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Watson v. MercerSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Lessee of Livingston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Cotten v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1856
- Horn v. GartmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1847
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Paramino Lumber Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Meyer v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.