Legal Opinion

Broughton v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 5, 1968No. 6724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

PORTER, District Judge.

This is an FELA case. Defendant has made a motion for a change of venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 which provides that such change can be ordered—

“(a) For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, * *

Prior to the enactment of this section, in 1948, the Federal Employers’ Liability Act secured to an injured employee the privilege of bringing an action in any district wherein the railroad was doing business, regardless of costs or inconvenience to the defendant. That latitude of choice ended with § 1404 because…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1976
  2. St. Joe Paper Co. v. Mullins Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1970
  3. Hayes v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API