Legal Opinion

Gross v. Penna. Mortgage and Loan Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am unable to discern in the act of 1919 (P.L. 1919 p. 500) any substantial change in the law as theretofore recognized and administered in this court in aid of creditors as against acts of debtors designed to hinder, delay or defraud them, except by the removal of the rule recognized in this jurisdiction prior to the enactment of that act which limited such remedies to judgment and attaching creditors. Section 10 of the act specifically extends the remedy there defined to creditors whose claims are not matured, and an earlier section of the act defines the word "creditors," as used in the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wynne v. Boone Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Lipskey v. VoloshenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. JirasekMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Trust Co. of Orange v. GarfinkelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  5. Fisovitz v. Cordosco Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API