Legal Opinion

Trust Co. of Orange v. Garfinkel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 20, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

The facts established at the hearing are that on May 20th, 1927, Samuel Garfinkel, one of the defendants-appellants, obtained a loan of $5,000 from the complainant-respondent, on the faith of a written statement in which he represented that he was the owner of ten shares of stock of the 105-107 Market Street Corporation, of the value of $37,500, and was the leaseholder of premises of the value of $20,000, and that with cash in bank, less $1,000 owed, he was worth about $56,950 net.

The note given for the loan was reduced by payments made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conway v. RaphelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  2. Horton v. BamfordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  3. Conway v. RaphelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Gross v. Penna. Mortgage and Loan Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. First Nat. Bank of Belleville v. MerrickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roxbury State Bank v. the ClarendonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Hollander v. GautierNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Miller v. LangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hayward v. Passaic Natl. Bank Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. Krafte v. BelfusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API