Legal Opinion
Conmar Products Corporation v. Tibony
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 30, 1945No. Civil Action 2225PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
Two defendant’s motions are here presented, in connection with the Report of the Special Master filed August 7, 1945, which motions were heard November 7, 1945.
The case went to trial as an inquest by reason of defendant’s failure to attend, although by answer filed November 10, 1941, he had pleaded matters concerning the nature of his employment by plaintiff, and his acquisition of knowledge of matters comprehended in the term trade secrets, etc., which could have been appropriately illuminated by his own testimony, and perhaps that of others. .
An interlocutory judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Computing Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- Schiff v. Hammond Clock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- De Long Corporation v. LucasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. v. Columbus Fiber Mills Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.