Legal Opinion

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 11, 1928PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteield, P. J.

The two cases grew out of the same railroad crossing accidents and were tried together. The declaration in the first case alleges “that on the 5th day of April, the plaintiff was crossing the railroad track owned and operated by the defendant at the crossing on said track commonly known as the Fulford crossing, or the crossing at Fulford in said county, the same being a public crossing for vehicles of all kinds and pedestrians and people of all kinds, and a crossing within a village thickly settled with people, and this plaintiff in crossing said railroad track was riding in a Chevrolet coupe…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. RusynikOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. MyrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hart, Et Vir v. HeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Wilhelm v. South Indian River Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Francis Melville TownsendSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Loftin v. McGregorSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  5. Van Allen v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API