Legal Opinion

Loftin v. McGregor

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 19, 1943PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for injuries sustained by reason of his car colliding with defendant's train. The collision occurred in the City of Miami where 7th Avenue traverses the double tracks of defendant at right angles. The crossing is at street level and, at the time this accident occurred, was protected by the statutory cross arm signal (Section 351.03, Florida Statutes, 1941) which carries the legend "Railroad Crossing. Look out for the Cars." The concrete surfaced avenue is 30 feet wide with a strip of asphalt where the tracks intersect. The cross arm signal is on the west side of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. MyrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. TomberlinSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  4. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Covington v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cassel v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Lowry v. Seaboard Airline R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. City of Miami v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Loftin v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. SEABOARD COAST LINE RD. CO. v. FriddleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API