Legal Opinion
Wilhelm v. South Indian River Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Wilhelm brought an action for damages alleging malicious prosecution. Defendants appeared and thereafter, on the rule day in September, 1925, default was regularly entered against them for want of plea or demurrer, and thus the case stood on September 15, 1927, when an attorney, not of record, on behalf of plaintiff filed with the clerk praecipe to have the case docketed for October term and also a notice that the case was at issue and ready for trial. The case…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- United States Savings Bank v. PittmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Russ v. GilbertSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Phillips v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pan American World Airways v. GregoryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
- Hart, Et Vir v. HeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Moore v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Beckwith v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.