Legal Opinion

In Re The Welfare Of T.a.w.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 2015No. 47364-0Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED OOE1 OF APPEALS DIVISION, 11 2015 JUL - 7 AM 8: 4 2 GTOt4 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHING DIVISION II In re the Adoption of T.A.W. No. 47364 -0 -II Respondents, V. PUBLISHED OPINION C. W., MAXA, J. — CW1 is the biological father and CB is the biological mother of TAW, an Indian2 child. CB is an Indian, but CW is not. CW appeals the trial court' s order terminating his parental rights and allowing RB, CB' s husband, to adopt TAW. CW argues that the trial court erred because it did not comply with applicable provisions in the federal and state versions of the Indian Child…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API