Legal Opinion

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 2013No. 12-399PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

*641This case is about a little girl (Baby Girl) who is classified as an Indian because she is 1.2% (3/256) Cherokee. Because Baby Girl is classified in this way, the South Carolina Supreme Court held that certain provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 required her to be taken, at the age of 27 months, from the only parents she had ever known and handed over to her biological father, who had attempted to relinquish his parental rights and who had no prior contact with the child. The provisions of the federal statute *2557at issue here do not demand this result.

Contrary to the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Matter of Adoption of TRMIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Delia v. E. M. A. ex rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Haaland v. BrackeenSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  2. Bryan Range v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Haaland v. BrackeenSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  5. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API