Betts v. Coltes
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL P. KING, Chief Judge.
The present issue presents another aspect of a suit challenging the constitutionality of Hawaii’s post-judgment garnishment statutes. 1
An earlier aspect of this suit involved Plaintiff Betts on behalf of herself and as representative of the class of all residents of the State of Hawaii who, after judgment has been rendered against them, have had or may have their property garnisheed pursuant to a garnishee summons issued under the terms of Haw.Rev.Stat. § 652-l(b); against Defendant Coltes as Clerk of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Betts v. TomDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977
- United States v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1975
- United States v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Betts v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Dionne v. BouleyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
- Strick Corp. v. Thai Teak Products Company, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.