Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2005No. ED 84364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape and attempted victim tampering. Because the trial court erred in excluding corroborating evidence of a videotape that elucidated the immediate surrounding circumstances of the alleged crimes, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

We recount the State’s version of events. In January 2002, the victim and Jonathan Young began dating. On the evening of January 31, 2002, Young drove the victim to the defendant’s house where the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. State v. MadsenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. State v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State of Missouri v. Phelton JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANTHONY MITCHELL COOPERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State of Missouri v. Ronald L. DavieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API