Legal Opinion

State v. Madsen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 13, 1989No. 71125PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMAR, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of forcible rape (§ 566.030, RSMo 1986) and forcible sodomy (§ 566.060, RSMo 1986). He appeals, invoking the jurisdiction of this court through a challenge to the constitutional validity of the “rape shield” statute, § 491.015, RSMo 1986. Although most of his constitutional challenges have been fuled against his position in earlier cases, cited in Part I of this opinion, he does present one ground which apparently has not been asserted before and so we accept jurisdiction.

The appellant’s brief, duplicated from typewritten copy, violates our Rule…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. MallettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ShaferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Stanley Boysiewick v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. State v. FractionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. MahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API