Kosters v. National Bank of Auburn
New York Supreme Court
Deivlubbeb by the defendant to plaintiff’s complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages she claims to have sustained by reason of falling on a sidewalk in the city of Auburn, where it is alleged there was an unusual accumulation of ice and snow which the defendant had negligently permitted to form and remain on the sidewalk in front of its premises.
The defendant demurs to the complaint on two grounds:
First. That there is a defect of parties defendant in that the city of Auburn is not made a party defendant.
Second. That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The complaint, among…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Taylor v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Fitzgerald v. . QuannNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Hall v. BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Rothschild v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson v. SchultzNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Madden v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, N.D. New York · 1916
- Willis v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916