Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Schultz
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.
Action by a wife and her husband to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services and expenses respectively. The action was severed as against the city of New York, and was tried without a jury against the defendant Schultz, who is the owner of the premises in front of which the accident occurred.
The proof is that the plaintiff Florence Nelson was injured on the morning of February 13, 1936, while walking on the sidewalk near the front property line of the Schultz property, between the entrance to the house and the driveway. There is sufficient evidence in the case to find that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Mullins v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Rohling v. EichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Troeger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
- Eldred v. KeenanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Golub v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Perrin v. Hilton International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Greenberg v. F. W. Woolworth Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Green v. Murray M. Rosenberg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1944
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.