Rothschild v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Simon Rothschild against the Rio Grande Western Railway Company. Defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment overruling its demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.
The defendant is a foreign corporation created by the laws of Colorado and Utah. It is sued upon interest coupons attached to mortgage bonds of another corporation. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is liable upon these coupons by reason of a consolidation of the corporation which issued the mortgage bonds with another corporation, and he claims that the present defendant, by this consolidation, became liable upon these coupons. The only allegation in the complaint from which this legal liability *362can be inferred is in these words: “ Thereby, and under the laws of the state of Colorado…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wabash Railroad Co. v. HassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Congregational Unitarian Society v. HaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Wright v. ChapinNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Congregational Unitarian Soc. v. HaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Kosters v. National Bank of AuburnNew York Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.