Hayward v. School District No. 9
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Barry; Smith, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit by Thomas Hayward against school district No. 9 of the township of Hope. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Plaintiff brings this suit, which is an action of trespass quare clausum fregit, to recover the value of a schoolhouse which he alleges defendant removed from his land. The schoolhouse was erected on the land in question in 1868. The land, which was subsequently transferred to plaintiff, then belonged to plaintiff’s father. During the construction of the building, defendant and plaintiff’s father orally assented that their rights should be determined by certain writing. By this writing defendant, for a consideration therein named, leased the land for 50 years, provided “that at any time that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Antoni v. BelknapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Osborn v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Carpenter v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Wycoff v. Gavriloff Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Higginbotham v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Waverly Park Amusement Co. v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Tilchin v. BoucherMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.