Legal Opinion
Klahr v. Goddard
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 2, 1966No. Civ. 5112-PhxPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought by Gary P. Klahr, as plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all of the persons of the voting population of the State of Arizona, against the defendants above named. The purpose of the action, as stated in the third amended complaint dated April 29, 1965, is to compel compliance by the officials of the State of Arizona, who are responsible for the supervision and conduct of the elections therein, with the requirements of the Equal Protection Clause of the Federal Constitution with respect to the apportionment of the seats in the two houses of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fortson v. DorseySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. TawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ely v. KlahrSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sims v. AmosDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1972
- Maryland Citizens Committee for Fair Congressional Redistricting, Inc. v. TawesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Klahr v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.