Legal Opinion

Lea v. Cone Mills Corporation

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided July 29, 1969No. C-176-D-66PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

EDWIN M. STANLEY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs, Shirley Lea, Romona Pinnix, and Annie Tinnin, all Negro females residing in Orange County, North Carolina, seek to restrain the defendant, Cone Mills Corporation, from continuing or maintaining any policy or practice limiting or otherwise interfering with the rights of plaintiffs, and others similarly situated, to enjoy equal employment opportunities without regard to race or color, as secured by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

The case was tried by the Court without a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State of Alabama v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Cypress v. Newport News General & Nonsectarian Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Dobbins v. Local 212, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1968

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Marcus Jones, Willie B. Hodge, Clifton Nickels and Clarence L. Irving v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAYES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API