Legal Opinion

Babcock v. People's Savings Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1889No. 12,796PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court:

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellants were warehousemen, and as such received and stored grain for hire. They received from Elies & Knauss a large quantity of flour, and issued to them warehouse receipts. There are several of these receipts, but, except as to dates, quantity, and the like, the language in each of them is.the same. They read thus: “Received from Elies & Knauss, in our William Street Warehouse, on storage from L. & N., 140 barrels of flour, to be delivered *213only on return of this certificate, properly endorsed, and payment of charges and insurance.

(Signed) “ E. S. Babcock & Son.”

The appellee, in good…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cowdrey v. VandenburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Quick v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ward v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Planters' Rice-Mill Co. v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Maxon v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Stamford Compress Co. v. Ft. Worth National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stamford Compress Co. v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. BankTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fletcher v. Great Western Elevator Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API