Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Stanolind Pipe Line Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1950No. 4083PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT,- Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this action in the District Court of Reno County, Kansas, to recover damages growing out of his discharge from the employment of appellee. The case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas on the ground of diversity. That court sustained a motion to dismiss the action on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. This appeal followed.

The complaint sets forth in substance that plaintiff had been in the employ of the defendant for a long period of time and had during such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Swart v. HustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Odell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. May v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Pleasure Driveway & Park District v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Wynn v. Boeing Military Airplane Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
  5. Liberty Finance Service, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API