Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 2000No. CF01075; CA A98831PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*682EDMONDS, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, attempted rape in the first degree, ORS 161.405; ORS 163.375, attempted sodomy in the first degree, ORS 161.405; menacing, ORS 163.190, and assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160. He makes two assignments of error: (1) The trial court erred by not conducting a hearing on the issue of defendant’s mental fitness to stand trial; (2) The trial court erred when it excluded evidence under OEC 412 of the victim’s sexually transmitted disease. We affirm.

Trial in this matter was scheduled for June…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Michigan v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. HayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Fells v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Fells v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API