Legal Opinion

State v. Hayne

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 15, 2018No. A160158 (Control); A160157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

*353The principal question presented in this appeal is how, if at all, the United States Supreme Court's decision in Indiana v. Edwards , 554 U.S. 164, 178, 128 S.Ct. 2379, 171 L. Ed. 2d 345 (2008), bears on the inquiry an Oregon court may conduct when considering whether to grant a mentally ill criminal defendant's request to exercise the right to self-representation. In Edwards , the Court held that the federal "Constitution permits States to insist upon representation by counsel for those competent enough to stand trial * * * but who still suffer from severe mental illness to the point where…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GroffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. NightingaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API