Legal Opinion
Sobel v. Higgins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered October 1, 1991, declaring that section 26-408 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York and section 2204.9 of the New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations (9 NYCRR) are constitutional and not violative of any right guaranteed to plaintiff under the 5th, 13th or 14th Amendments of the US Constitution, or sections 6 or 7 of article I of the New York Constitution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff is the owner and landlord of a four-story "row-house” which, at all times since…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Seawall Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Grossman v. BaumgartnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gennadiy Nekrilov v. City of Jersey CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Dawson v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fitzgerald v. Cambridge Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994