Legal Opinion

Associated Mutuals Inc. v. Coe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1943No. 14536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

1. In the circumstances appearing in the foregoing statement of facts the judge on interlocutory hearing entered the following order: “In the contract between plaintiff and defendant Coe it is provided that, for two years after the termination of the defendant Coe’s employment with plaintiff, defendant is prohibited in five specific particulars from interfering with the business of plaintiff. The contract dose not prohibit the defendant Coe from entering into the same or a similar business; and although it prohibits defendant Coe from doing five specific acts, it does not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moon v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Sapp v. RitchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Voyles v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Holland Pecan Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Dickson v. Warren Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API