Legal Opinion

Watson v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 29, 1923No. 7 Div. 407PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The important question presented by the record is upon the sufficiency vel non of the presentation of the claim which is the foundation of the suit, to prevent the operation of the statute of nonclaim (Code, § 2590) in favor of the estate of the defendant’s intestate.

The affidavit of claim, which was presented to the defendant administrator by filing in the probate office, stated that — ■

“The estate of N. O. Hamilton is justly indebted to the estate of E. E. Hamilton in the sum of $2,120.49; that the indebtedness became due to the estate of E. E. Hamilton, now deceased; the said amount became…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Floyd v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Smith v. FellowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Kornegay v. MayerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Posey v. Decatur BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. CotnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Metcalf v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. ChichesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Watson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API