Legal Opinion

Auster v. Keck

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1976No. 47935PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

In this case we are asked to decide when a cause of action for architectural malpractice accrues under section 15 of the Limitations Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 83, par. 16), which provides:

“[A] ctions *** to recover damages for an injury done to property, real or personal, *** and all civil actions not otherwise provided for, shall be commenced within 5 years next after the cause of action accrued.”

In 1969 the plaintiffs, Michael Auster, Jr., and Anita Auster, bought a house in Highland Park from Edward K. and June Isaacson. The house had been designed in 1960 by the defendants, George…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lipsey v. Michael Reese HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Waterford Condominium Ass'n v. Dunbar Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Dolce v. GamberdinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Cutsinger v. CullinanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API