Legal Opinion
Brooke v. Mt. Hood Meadows Oreg., Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 24, 1986No. A8309-05568; CA A34946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Plaintiffs are three of 18 limited partners in Mt. Hood Meadows, Oreg., Ltd., a limited partnership established to carry on the business of constructing and operating a winter sports development in the Hood River Meadows area of the Mt. Hood National Forest. They brought this action against the general partner, Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp., and the partnership for money had and received and conversion. The conversion claim was dismissed on the pleadings; after a trial on the merits, the court awarded judgment to plaintiffs on their claim for money had and received. Defendants appeal,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lichtyger v. Franchard Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Bassan v. Investment Exchange Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- Beeson v. HegstadOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Iwasaki v. Iwasaki Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alzado v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Bray v. American Property Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Hawkins v. 1000 Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Brooke v. Mt. Hood Meadows Oreg., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Bauer v. BLOMFIELD CO./HOLDEN J. VENTUREAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.