Legal Opinion

Brooke v. Mt. Hood Meadows Oreg., Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 1987No. A8309-05568; CA A34946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In their petition for reconsideration, petitioners contend that in our former opinion, 81 Or App 387, 725 P2d 925 (1986), we did not correctly apply the standard of review on an appeal from a denial of a judgment on the pleadings, citing Salem Sand v. City of Salem, 260 Or 630, 492 P2d 271 (1971). That case holds that the motion may be allowed when the pleadings taken together affirmatively show that the plaintiff has no cause of action against the defendant.

The most notable omission from petitioners’ petition is any discussion of the pleadings. Instead, they discuss evidence from which one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salem Sand & Gravel Company v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Brooke v. Mt. Hood Meadows Oreg., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alzado v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Hawkins v. 1000 Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Olsen v. City of CoburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API