Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1952No. 110PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

Since the deprivation of personal liberty suffered by a plaintiff and all circumstances of aggravation attending it constitute elements of damage in an action for malicious prosecution, the present plaintiff’s version of the facts accompanying his arrest and imprisonment is clearly germane to his second cause of action. 54 C.J.S., Malicious Prosecution, section 112.'

G.S. 1-163 provides that “the judge may . . . amend any pleading . . . by inserting . . . allegations material to the case,” and G.S. 1-152 specifies that “the judge may likewise, in his discretion, . . . allow an . . . act to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. . ColeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. In re SummersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Smith v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Tallassee Power Co. v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Cherry v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Early v. EleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Heath v. KirkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Blevins v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API